Home » Writing Craft » Mind Your Own Business! or Maintaining the POV

Mind Your Own Business! or Maintaining the POV

posted in: Writing Craft 7

Once upon a time, it was common for books to be written in an omniscient third-person voice. A disembodied and all-seeing narrator told you the story, gentle reader, and he knew what every character was thinking and how they looked as well. Increasingly, though, readers seem to want the in-head experience of close third-person. One character carries them around through the action of the novel, and they see the world and other characters though her eyes. She can report her own inner thoughts and feelings, but not those of others. She can tell you what other people look like, but not (except through some tricky devices) herself.

As a reader, I find close third-person to be satisfying on many levels. It often comes across as more intimate than first person, because it seems less guarded. And it doesn’t preclude getting other characters’ viewpoint, because the POV personage can change (please signal to the reader when this happens!). CTP only means that at any one time, only one character is looking out upon the world with you inside her.

But it’s harder than it looks to maintain this single POV strictly. Let’s consider some ways in which the author may betray his single viewpoint almost without noticing.

No Mind-Reading Allowed

There’s the first rule. Joe can’t know what Jane is thinking. If they’re friends of long date, he may be able to guess, but there’s no guarantee he’s right.

Assume that each of these examples is observed from Joe’s POV and see what’s presumptuous about each:

Joe was delighted, and so was Jane.
Jane appeared in the doorway when she heard Joe’s voice.
Joe hugged Winnie, and from behind him, Jane smiled too.

These are all scenarios that an omnipotent third-peron voice permits to happen. But if we’re in Joe’s head, we’re presented with the following problems:

Joe knows he’s delighted, but he can’t know that Jane is. He can only see that she’s smiling and clapping her hands — external gestures.

Joe can’t know why Jane appeared. Is it because she heard his voice or because she had finished making dinner or …?

Joe can’t see behind his own shoulder to know that Jane is smiling. He can hear her laugh or say something, but he can’t see her unless he’s an extraordinarily gifted fellow.

Mirror, Mirror

Another mistake that’s easy to fall into is the mirror effect. Joe can’t see his own face under normal conditions. So the following statements can’t be made in close third-person voice from his POV:

Joe’s face grew crimson.
Joe smiled and his irresistible dimples flashed.

We can know from within Joe’s head that his face grows hot, or that he feels overwhelmed by shame. But we can’t know what color he becomes because he can’t know. He can’t see his own face.

For the same reason, he can’t tell us about his dimples because he can’t see them. If you want to say something about them, better make Jane reflect the knowledge.

Joe smiled. Jane said, “I’d forgotten you had dimples.”

There are gross examples of jumping into another person’s head, and there are subtler ones. Just be conscious of the danger, and you’ll come out fine. And to be sure, send it past an editor. It’s always easier to spot someone else’s lapses than your own!

 

Follow N.L. Holmes:
N.L. Holmes is the pen name of a real-life archaeologist who writes books set in the Late Bronze Age in Egypt and the Hittite Empire. She grew up in a book-loving family, and as soon as she retired from teaching, she couldn’t wait to turn the events of history into fiction. Field excavation has given her a taste for the little details of ancient life. She lives in France and Florida with her husband and two cats. Website

7 Responses

  1. Shutta Crum
    |

    Good examples. Thanks. I’m working on a program that I’m presenting next week. This will help.

  2. Niki Kantzios
    |

    Glad to be of help. Good luck with your program–I’m sure it will be great!

  3. Ken Pelham
    |

    I talk to a lot of writers about viewpoint issues. You’ve concisely hit some of the most important. Well done!

  4. Niki Kantzios
    |

    Thanks, Ken. To err is human, etc., but just being aware of the problem can eliminate a lot of it.

  5. Lee Gramling
    |

    Important points to be remembered. But as you suggest, there are work-arounds a writer can use to shift POV without jarring the reader or breaking the “contract” with him or her. I will never forget the conclusion of Louis L’Amour’s second Barnabus Sackett novel, in which the FIRST-PERSON NARRATOR dies at the end! Masterfully done, and serves as a reminder that a writer should never let presumed “rules” get in the way of the story!

  6. Niki Kantzios
    |

    I love it! What daring!

  7. Brenda Weathers Hargroves
    |

    Like many budding authors, I initially struggled with POV. As I became more aware of my shifts, I found many of the mistakes amusing like your example of Joe’s face. But I love Lee’s comment about breaking the rules.

Comments are closed.